Â鶹´«Ã½

UNDT/2010/038

View PDF

UNDT/2010/038, Attandi

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal takes note that the Applicant has failed to file his application within the deadline given to him in the Tribunal’s Order of 22 January 2010 and even beyond. It also notes that the Applicant has not provided any reasonable explanation as to why he did not comply with the Order of the Tribunal. By his behaviour and attitude the Applicant has displayed a singular blatant ignorance of a court order. His conduct is one of contempt of the Tribunal. This attitude does not befit persons who like the Applicant come to seek justice and a vindication of their rights before the Tribunal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his contract.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Attandi
Entity
UNON
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NBI/2009/012
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Nairobi
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Boolell
Language of Judgment
English
French
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Appointment (type)
Non-renewal
Applicable Law
Former Staff Rules
Secretary-General's bulletins