Â鶹´«Ã½

UNDT/2021/147

View PDF

UNDT/2021/147, Rubwindi

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal concludes that the contested decision, lawful or not, does not result from a disciplinary process and is therefore not exempted from management evaluation. Accordingly, in application of staff rule 11.2, the Applicant ought to have requested management evaluation before filing his appeal before this Tribunal. Having failed to do so, the application is not receivable ratione materiae.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Withdrawal of after service heahth insurance entitlements.

Legal Principle(s)

What determines whether a challenged administrative decision must be submitted for management evaluation is whether it follows the completion of a disciplinary process conducted pursuant to this framework.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Rubwindi
Entity
RSCE
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NY/2021/047/T
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
New York
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Adda
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Compensation
Applicable Law
Staff Rules
Administrative Instructions